warnings report on builder wrong?

[Joel Sherrill]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, 2:19 AM Karel Gardas <karel at functional.vision> wrote:

> On 2/14/23 05:34, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 14/2/2023 10:47 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >> Chris.. see below
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 5:42 PM Karel Gardas <karel at functional.vision>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>      On 2/14/23 00:33, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>      > With fresh tools on CentOS 7, I have 5 warnings in
> beaglebonewhite. Log
> >>      > attached.
> >>      >
> >>      > Sorry it took so long. I ran out of disk space, then got
> distracted.
> >>      >
> >>      > I have no idea why the rtems-bsp-builder isn't tripping these
> unless it
> >>      > isn't actually hitting the default build settings. But these
> warnings
> >>      > looked pretty generic at first glance.
> >>      >
> >>
> >>      Don't worry about delay, I was just reporting those as you IIRC
> asked
> >>      for warnings fixes and I just saw evidence that builder is not
> showing
> >>      actual state.
> >>
> >>      Is it possible that software building the table for the report is
> a bit
> >>      buggy and ignores warnings or it assign those into wrong category?
> If
> >>      you would have build logs from those then such judgment is easy to
> do...
> >>
> >>
> >> Chris wrong the bsp builder so I have no idea. But I saw ones which were
> >> triggered in bsp specific files along with some tests. The tests might
> have
> >> gotten counted elsewhere. Fix them if you see them.
> >
> > It could do with some love. I am not able to take a look for a few weeks.
> >
> > I suggest a ticket is created.
>
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4856


While running errands last night, I wondered if the more verbose warning
and error messages from more recent GCC versions break the pattern matching.

--joel

>
>
> Karel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20230214/11151ed6/attachment.htm>