[PATCH 1/1] trace: build with c++17 if building against llvm 16+

[Chris Johns]

On 22/9/2023 2:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 22.09.23 04:36, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Are we doing something that particularly requires C++17? AFAIK we haven't
>> needed it yet and why wouldn't it also be needed with gcc? If the default on
>> recent gcc versions is that, ok but we should be precise in case an older gcc
>> with a different default is used.
> 
> The problem is not that we use features of a particular standard. It is that
> LLVM requires a particular standard for the header files it ships and that we use.
> 
> I already fixed this some time ago:
> 
> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2023-May/075269.html
> 
> However, Chris didn't like the change.

The issue was not specially about that change but the tested hosts. I am fine if
the referenced change builds on a recent MacOS and FreeBSD 13. I am still none
the wiser?

Chria