AW: Naming convention for Rust target platforms

[Jan.Sommer at dlr.de]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Januar 2024 11:08
> An: devel <devel at rtems.org>
> Cc: Sommer, Jan <Jan.Sommer at dlr.de>
> Betreff: Re: Naming convention for Rust target platforms
> 
> Hello Jan,
> 
> On 29.01.24 19:41, Jan.Sommer at dlr.de wrote:
> > So, for the Zynq and similar BSPs this would yield for the Rust target
> > something like: armv7a-rtems6-eabihf (and possibly armv7a-rtems6-eabi).
> > Similarly, for other ARM BSPs additional Rust targets would need to be
> > added. Which might add up to quite a  number of Rust targets over time.
> > Is this fine or do you see another solution?
> 
> how are the GCC machine flags determined (for linking)? Are they derived
> from the target name?
> 

In my current setup I read the information from the pkgconfig files of the BSP.
I remember that at some point the pkgconfig was marked as experimental.
Is that still the case or is it now an official part of the RTEMS6 release?


> --
> embedded brains GmbH & Co. KG
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
> 
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/