BBB: "sd" command

Jarielle Catbagan jcatbagan93 at
Tue Aug 4 01:12:00 UTC 2015

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Ed Sutter <edsutterjr at> wrote:
> Thinking about it...
> I don't even know what we would need the "cmd" command for anyway;
> so, for now, I suggest you just move on to Ethernet.
> (it's your call)
> Ed

Ok, will do.  I'll get started on Ethernet once I get the patches for
the MMC interface submitted.  I'm currently in the process of cleaning
up the MMC interface code already implemented and then I'll be
submitting the patches.

>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ed Sutter <edsutterjr at> wrote:
>>> Jarielle,
>>> Couple of things...
>>> - Just realized that I didn't test the 'sd cmd' command; however that's
>>> really only needed for
>>>    "special" interaction with the card.
>> As of right now, I didn't implement 'sd cmd' as it would require
>> modifying the core sd.c file.  The response content and length are
>> different in SD mode as opposed to SPI mode.  Perhaps, this could be
>> generalized to include SD mode as well?
>>> - I pushed two additional small fixes in the core code related to stuff I
>>> put in with the original
>>> tree.  A warning fix in xmodem.c and a fix for the verbose help text in
>>> the
>>> sd command.
>> Thanks!  I will pull in the changes to my local branch.
>>> Ed
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> umon-devel mailing list
>>> umon-devel at
> _______________________________________________
> umon-devel mailing list
> umon-devel at

More information about the umon-devel mailing list