4.5.0-beta2

[Joel Sherrill]

Does user.cfg to point to the right
version of RTEMS?  

--joel


James Housley wrote:
> 
> I am having trouble with -beta2.  I have downloaded:
> 
> binutils-2.9.5.0.24-rtems-20000207.diff
> binutils-2.9.5.0.24.tar.gz
> c_build_scripts-4.5.0-beta2.tgz
> gcc-2.95.2-rtems-20000106.diff
> gcc-2.95.2.tar.gz
> newlib-1.8.2-rtems-20000131.diff
> newlib-1.8.2.tar.gz
> rtems-4.5.0-beta2.tgz
> 
> I untared and patched binutils, gcc and newlib and c_build_scripts and
> that went fine.  I then did a ./bit m68k and they all compiled and
> installed with out a problem.  I then untared rtems-4.5.0-beta2.tgz.
> This is where I start having problems.
> 
> ./bit_rtems m68k
> or ./bit_rtems m68k efi332 both produce the same error:
> 
> gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.^M
> gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.^M
> gmake[3]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/home/housley/tools/build-m68k-rtems/tools'^M
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/home/housley/tools/build-m68k-rtems/tools'^M
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/home/housley/tools/build-m68k-rtems/tools'^M
> Making install in c^M
> cd: can't cd to c^M
> gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1^M
> ERROR: failed gmake install.^M
> exit: Illegal number: ./bit_rtems^M
> 
> The problem is it is trying to use build-m68k-rtems/c instead of
> build-m68k-rtems/m68k-rtems/c and I have tried all sorts of hacking to
> make it work, and have failed.
> 
> Jim
> --
> Unix is very user-friendly.  It's just picky who its friends are.

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel at OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985