stacking of rtems_clock_tick?

[Efren Serra]

"Aaron J. Grier" wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 09:19:09AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > "Aaron J. Grier" wrote:
> > >
> > > sp tests 11, 14, 22, and 24 are all bombing out with
> > >
> > > _Thread_Dispatch_disable_level is (0) not 1
> > >
> > > any ideas?
> >
> > Which version of RTEMS are you using?
>
> 4.5.0-beta3a.
>
> > This integrity check was fairly recently added and some tests tried to
> > print from context switch user extensions which ended up violating
> > this.
> >
> > Where is the failure?
>
> c/src/tests/sptests/sp11/timer.c line #95, in TA2_send_10_to_self()
>
> c/src/tests/sptests/sp14/task1.c line #31, in Signal_3_to_task_1()
>
> c/src/tests/sptests/sp22/delay.c line #30, in Delayed_resume()
>
> c/src/tests/sptests/sp24/resume.c line #32, in Resume_task()
>
> all failures are generated from the directive_failed_with_level macro,
> and all above functions are being called from _Watchdog_Tickle.
>
> shouldn't _Thread_Dispatch_disable_level be 0 if you're being called
> from a watchdog, since _Watchdog_Tickle_Ticks is separate from
> _Thread_Dispatch?
>
> --
>   Aaron J. Grier   |    Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR   |   aaron at frye.com
>    "Cthulhu for President. Why settle for a lesser evil?" -- Matt Minnis

Why are you using 4.5.0-beta3a?  I downloaded 4.5.0-beta3 a while ago from
RTEMS.
Joel?  Did the 4.5.0-beta3 sources get blown away?

-efren-