stacking of rtems_clock_tick?
Aaron J. Grier
aaron at frye.com
Fri Aug 18 16:28:58 UTC 2000
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 09:19:09AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> "Aaron J. Grier" wrote:
> > sp tests 11, 14, 22, and 24 are all bombing out with
> > _Thread_Dispatch_disable_level is (0) not 1
> > any ideas?
> Which version of RTEMS are you using?
> This integrity check was fairly recently added and some tests tried to
> print from context switch user extensions which ended up violating
> Where is the failure?
c/src/tests/sptests/sp11/timer.c line #95, in TA2_send_10_to_self()
c/src/tests/sptests/sp14/task1.c line #31, in Signal_3_to_task_1()
c/src/tests/sptests/sp22/delay.c line #30, in Delayed_resume()
c/src/tests/sptests/sp24/resume.c line #32, in Resume_task()
all failures are generated from the directive_failed_with_level macro,
and all above functions are being called from _Watchdog_Tickle.
shouldn't _Thread_Dispatch_disable_level be 0 if you're being called
from a watchdog, since _Watchdog_Tickle_Ticks is separate from
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | aaron at frye.com
"Cthulhu for President. Why settle for a lesser evil?" -- Matt Minnis
More information about the users