prebuilt tool binaries question
Dario Alcocer
dalcocer at home.com
Fri May 19 10:30:51 UTC 2000
>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> writes:
Joel> Hi,
Joel> We are trying to figure out what host OSes it make sense to
Joel> prebuilt tool binaries for. The list of targets will be as
Joel> complete as possible like with the RPMs (i386, i960, m68k,
Joel> mips, powerpc, sh, and sparc). I think this list covers
Joel> most RTEMS users:
Joel> + FreeBSD x86 - don't know packaging yet. Could something
Joel> be derived via RPM specs? Could x86 Linux binaries be
Joel> converted?
FreeBSD can run Linux binaries. Regarding packaging, I think the
standard for FreeBSD is 'pkg' format (not the same format as the Sun
package format of the same name.)
Joel> I do know of a couple of odd issues that impact the
Joel> usefulness of the configurations being built. For example,
Joel> the m68k gdb does not include Eric Norum's bdm kit.
What would it take to fold in the BDM patches into GDB binaries? I
would guess that a BDM-capable m68k/coldfire gdb would be a very
common case, one that would be nice to support "out of the box."
Joel> I would like to thank Ralf Corsepius and David Fiddes for
Joel> all the help they have given in getting this far. If there
Joel> is a FreeBSD tool packaging expert out there, volunteer. It
Joel> will speed things up considerably. :)
Well, I wouldn't call myself an expert, but I can help out with the
FreeBSD packaging effort. Besides, it gives me a convenient excuse to
get back into the RTEMS fold.
--
Dario Alcocer // dalcocer at home.com
More information about the users
mailing list