autoheader problem

[Daniel Talayco]

The problem occurred after applying the patch.  In fact I thought it was b/c of the patch.  I've had some clock skew problems, but that seems unlikely in this case.

Anyway, I broke down and installed autoconf (and M4) locally just in case....

-Dan


Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> Daniel Talayco wrote:
> >
> > Hi--
> >
> > I don't know if this is a common problem (I didn't have it installing 4.0.0) but I had it trying to compile the tools for 4.5.0beta3.  Running bit, I hit
> >
> > cd ../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc && autoheader
> > /bin/sh: autoheader: not found
> > gmake[1]: *** [../../gcc-2.95.2/gcc/cstamp-h.in] Error 1
> > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/det/tools/build-powerpc-tools/gcc'
> > gmake: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
> > ERROR: **** FAILED **** base build (step 1)
> >
> > I think I found a solution in the gcc (egcs) mail archives:
> >
> > find . -name configure -print | xargs touch
> >
> > Judging from the solution (and message), I take it that the patch makes the makefile think that configure needs to be regenerated using autoconf (and that autoheader is a part of that).
> >
> > I'm assuming that the configuration files do NOT need to be regenerated; if someone knows otherwise, please correct me (and send me to an autoconf distribution).
> 
> Is this before or after applying the RTEMS patch?  The
> patch should be modifying configure AFTER configure.in.
> Maybe this is not enough to satisfy the timestamp check
> in make. :(
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> 
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> joel at OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
>    Support Available             (256) 722-9985