m68k gcc was Re: BSP for 5307

[Brett Swimley]

How about the hardware divide patch?

Thanks,

Brett Swimley
Sr. Design Engineer
Advanced Electronic Designs, Inc.
brett.swimley at aedinc.net
ph: 406-585-8892
fax: 406-585-8893
www.aedinc.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cjohns at kiwi.objectivedesign.com.au
> [mailto:cjohns at kiwi.objectivedesign.com.au]On Behalf Of Chris Johns
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:02 AM
> To: Peter Barada
> Cc: joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com; rtems-users at oarcorp.com
> Subject: Re: m68k gcc was Re: BSP for 5307
> 
> 
> Peter Barada wrote:
> > 
> > >This is slowly happening. The problem with some of the 
> patches is they
> > >cannot be cleanly signed over to the FSF.
> > >
> > >I know Peter Barada <pbarada at mail.wm.sps.mot.com> is 
> working to get some
> > >of the patches sorted out. I am not sure about the uclunix patches.
> > 
> > Yes, I'm working on the coldfire changes for v3/v4/v4e, but 
> I haven't
> > convinced the lawyers to sign off yet.
> 
> If it helps, your efforts are most welcome and needed by all Coldfire
> users.
> 
> >  I'm also having trouble getting g++ to build with gcc-20020211.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > I think in my version I'll
> > have all of Fiddes' patches, but I'll have to double check.
> 
> Does that include the interrupt keyword patch and improved soft float
> patches ?
> 
> -- 
>  Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec.com.au
>