ARM Patch

Jay Monkman jtm at
Wed Jul 17 14:36:25 UTC 2002

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:25:45AM -0500, Charles Steaderman wrote:

> and I received errors attached. I got similar results patching 20020301.

I think the rejects are fine, except for irq_asm.S. When I tested the
patch, the rejects were only CVS strings in comments. You can look at
them all with  'find . -name \*.rej -print | xargs less' in Linux.

I'm not sure how to make CVS generate a patch that will apply without
rejects. (I used 'cvs diff -Nau -r RTEMS_SS_20020301 > cvs.diff')
If I export the code from CVS, then diff it against the original from
OAR, I get a lot of diffs from the CVS revision strings in comments.

Jay Monkman	    The truth knocks on the door and you say "Go away, I'm 
                    looking for the truth," and so it goes away. Puzzling.
		     - from _Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_Maintenance_

More information about the users mailing list