strauman at slac.stanford.edu
Tue Sep 10 06:54:26 UTC 2002
Fernando RUIZ CASAS wrote:
>You can do it add a task delete callback funtion.
While this would be feasible, it makes porting existing
code / writing portable code a nuisance.
BTW: I believe it's really a termios driver issue rather
than a pty one. If termios provided the hooks, it would
be easy for pty to use them. (As I said, I'm currently using
>Almost this is my opinion.
>The PTY is only a driver low_level.
>A very reduced implentation to give at rtems the telnetd posibility.
>If you need a new funcion when EOF it's possible adding it.
>Fernando RUIZ CASAS
>home: correo at fernando-ruiz.com
>work: fernandoruiz at wanadoo.fr
>>De: Till Straumann [mailto:strauman at SLAC.Stanford.EDU]
>>Enviado el: viernes, 06 de septiembre de 2002 22:06
>>Para: rtems-users at oarcorp.com
>>Asunto: termios/PTY problem
>>I don't like the way the PTY driver reacts to the
>>network connection being closed (from the remote
>>Currently, it just closes stdin&friends and deletes
>>the task that is using the PTY. This gives that
>>task no chance to cleanup resources.
>>IMO, it should rather propagate an EOF condition
>>Unfortunately, however, the termios driver seems
>>not to be capable to convey EOF detected by
>>a lowlevel driver to the caller of rtems_termios_read()
>>and rtems_termios_write() etc.
>>Shouldn't we fix this? I have a patch for pty to hack
>>around this (it also does NAWS and provides TIOCGWINSZ)
>>but IMHO it's really a termios problem.
More information about the users