How to build Unix BSP ?
Aaron J. Grier
aaron at frye.com
Fri Aug 1 21:31:51 UTC 2003
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:33:13AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 22:40, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> > what's the alternative [to RTEMS application makefile templates]?
>
> How do you build applications in general?
if they're small, like shell scripts and single-file C programs, by
hand. if they're larger, with makefiles.
> I don't know, I can't know, I should not have to worry about.
I see your point.
> To exaggerate: Do you use the Linux, the Solaris or the Win98
> Kernel-Makefile-fragments for your applications?
at the very least someone using RTEMS needs to know where the libraries
and headers are located. but things can get tricky; how do you decide
what to link with if you want stubbed managers or debugging versions of
libraries? a simple -lrtemsall doesn't cover these cases. it seems
logical that these should be documented in some machine-readable form.
> > automake?
> automake is one technical alternative to help users to implement
> Makefiles, that's all. The RTEMS makefile-fragments just another one.
are there any other alternatives?
> => All in all, this results into a pretty inflexible, error-prone and
> hardly maintainable infrastructure.
my biggest complaint with the current makefile stubs is that they are
somewhat twisty to read and difficult to work in a non-recursive form.
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | aaron at frye.com
More information about the users
mailing list