The eCos, QNX, ChorusOs irq handling API
Valette Eric
eric.valette at free.fr
Wed Feb 19 22:40:52 UTC 2003
gregory.menke at gsfc.nasa.gov wrote:
> I would prefer to keep the semantics of setting a vector and then
> allowing the interrupt itself to be disabled- the RTEMS task interrupt
> level provides a means of controlling the set of enabled interrupts on
> a per task basis. Its not been useful to me yet, but I'd hate to
> loose functionality in an enhancement.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If processor IRQ enabling level
is part of a SR and saved as part of the context switch, fine. However,
allowing such things, makes it very difficult to guaranty any interrupt
latency... Besides, I do not see what in the current new API prevents
that...
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. 6 rue Paul Le Flem
(___, / (_(_(__ 35740 Pace
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76
E-mail: eric.valette at free.fr
More information about the users
mailing list