Thread question

[Angelo Fraietta]

Kenneth Peters wrote:

> I'd love to submit something, but I know I won't have time to put 
> together something reasonable in the near future (though if no one has 
> done it by the time I might have a chance, I'll keep this on my list). 
> My modified rtems_task_mode() is a very kludgy way to do this; I think 
> it's harmful to just slap extra parameters into the function calls.
>
I remember we talked about this last year. I saw this same thing happen 
with ATI Nucleus back in 2000 (except they did not know what was causing 
the problem)

You could place a rtems_task_wake_after 1 where you require the thread 
to relinquish. That should get you out of trouble for the time being.
Let us know how it works out for you

-- 
Angelo Fraietta

PO Box 859
Hamilton NSW 2303

Home Page


http://www.users.bigpond.com/angelo_f/

There are those who seek knowledge for the sake of knowledge - that is CURIOSITY
There are those who seek knowledge to be known by others - that is VANITY
There are those who seek knowledge in order to serve - that is LOVE
    Bernard of Clairvaux (1090 - 1153)