volatile in struct

[Chris Johns]

Juergen Zeller wrote:
> 
> Can anyone out there explain whats going on here? I never thought that 
> volatile could be responsible for errors. Is it because it's inside a 
> struct?
> 
> I think I know the meaning of volatile and this is what you discussed.
> But how can it be that the use of volatile is more faulty than without?
> 

Maybe it would help if you could post a more specific example of the 
code that shows the problem you are seeing.

-- 
  Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec . com . au