BSPs for Potential Deprecation

[Jay Monkman]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 11:15:13AM -0500, Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp.com> wrote:
> Ivica Mikec wrote:
> >I would like to keep mips p4000 since it can be used for any MIPS32 port.
> 
> OK.  Do you actually compile and link it?  I am not as keen on getting 
> rid of this BSP as many others but it is a thorn because we never
> seem to have the magic combination of gcc CPU arguments to make
> them (p4600, p4650) link.

Since we have a MIPS32 BSP ready to go in, is it worth keeping the
p4000?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041028/e49630c5/attachment.bin>