Is powerpc/eth_comm a potential deprecation candidate?

[Jay Monkman]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:12:56PM -0500, Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp.com> wrote:
> 
> I have been asked privately if the powerpc/eth_comm BSP
> should be considered for deprecation.

Probably. I'm trying to find out if it ever made it into
production. Since there are other mpc8xx BSPs, the eth_comm one isn't
very important, especially if none of them exist.

While we are killing BSPs, how about arm/vegaplus and
arm/arm_bare_bsp? If I remember correctly, the vegaplus never ran - it
was just a dump of a work in progress in case someone ever wanted an
ARM BSP.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041028/c00977e0/attachment-0001.bin>