MVME5500 board support status?

Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com> joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Thu Oct 27 11:29:47 UTC 2005


Kate Feng wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 at 07:21:43 AM, Kate Feng wrote :
> 
> 
>>The tools I used for
>>the 4.6.0 version I posted on the WEB are :
> 
> 
>>binutils-2.13.2.1
>>gcc-3.2.2
>>newlib-1.11.0
> 
>  > automake-1.9.2  (from GNU site)
> 
>>autoconf-2.59   (from GNU site)
> 
> 
> While retrieving back information from the mailing list
> for my own reference, I realized that I made an honest  and
> obvious mistake.  Others know better about tools than me.
> However,   here is to get the record straight:
> 
> All the tools were obtained from the RTEMS web site.
> 
> The  automake-1.9.2  and autoconf-2.59   were downloaded
> form the RTEMS site while I was trying RTEMS4.7
> in 2003.  For  the  4.6.0 version I posted on the WEB, I used
> 
>  autoconf-2.57
>  automake-1.7.2 or  automake-1.7.6
> 
> However, it was reported that the new tools  from the
> current RTEMS site  works on the RTEMS-4.6.0-MVME5500
> as well.

So has someone actually tried a gcc 4.0.x with the mvme5500?
Most BSPs have worked fine with gcc 4.0.x but a few have been optimized 
into breaking. :)

--joel



More information about the users mailing list