MVME5500 board support status?
Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Thu Oct 27 11:29:47 UTC 2005
Kate Feng wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 at 07:21:43 AM, Kate Feng wrote :
>
>
>>The tools I used for
>>the 4.6.0 version I posted on the WEB are :
>
>
>>binutils-2.13.2.1
>>gcc-3.2.2
>>newlib-1.11.0
>
> > automake-1.9.2 (from GNU site)
>
>>autoconf-2.59 (from GNU site)
>
>
> While retrieving back information from the mailing list
> for my own reference, I realized that I made an honest and
> obvious mistake. Others know better about tools than me.
> However, here is to get the record straight:
>
> All the tools were obtained from the RTEMS web site.
>
> The automake-1.9.2 and autoconf-2.59 were downloaded
> form the RTEMS site while I was trying RTEMS4.7
> in 2003. For the 4.6.0 version I posted on the WEB, I used
>
> autoconf-2.57
> automake-1.7.2 or automake-1.7.6
>
> However, it was reported that the new tools from the
> current RTEMS site works on the RTEMS-4.6.0-MVME5500
> as well.
So has someone actually tried a gcc 4.0.x with the mvme5500?
Most BSPs have worked fine with gcc 4.0.x but a few have been optimized
into breaking. :)
--joel
More information about the users
mailing list