Xilinx IP core drivers for RTEMS- diff attached
joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Thu Dec 7 16:18:02 UTC 2006
Thomas Doerfler wrote:
> Keith Robertson schrieb:
>> gregory.menke at gsfc.nasa.gov wrote:
>>> Robert S. Grimes writes:
>>> I like the new bsp idea as well. Maybe the thing to do is create a
>>> "virtex4" bsp containing a copy of the gen405 bsp as-is, then I could
>>> check in my patches against the new virtex bsp.
>> Sounds good. Perhaps 'virtex' is a better name however. There's
>> hardcore ppc405's in the virtex 2 pro, virtex4 fx, and to be released
>> virtex5 fx.
> I am really looking forward for a new BSP like this. But I am not SO
> glad with the name recommendations, because I am sure there are other
> cores (a LEON/Sparc? a OpenCore OR32?) which could be implemented in a
> VIRTEX FPGA. And Although the BSP code itself is encapsulated in the
> PowerPC tree, at least the config file "<bsp>.cfg" is in the shared
> directory make/custom. So Maybe a more striking name for the BSP would
> be good, like "virtex-ppc405" or so?
Good point on the simple virtex name for the BSP.
Ralf question... is it legal to have a "-" in a BSP name? None of them
now. I don't know whether it would break something or not.
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.com
More information about the users