[Fwd: Newlib 1.16.0 snapshot approaching]

[Till Straumann]

How about the newlib patch added in 1247 ?
This should be straightforward.

Then there is 1246 which also requires a newlib patch
but is more complicated.

IMO, at least 1247 should make it (but 1246 would also
be good. Currently, threads using stdin/stdout/stderr
leak memory when they are deleted (IIRC)).

T.

Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> FYI.. time to clean out the closet. :-D
>
> --joel
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Newlib 1.16.0 snapshot approaching
> From:
> Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat.com>
> Date:
> Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:25:09 -0500
> To:
> "'newlib at sources.redhat.com'" <newlib at sources.redhat.com>
>
> To:
> "'newlib at sources.redhat.com'" <newlib at sources.redhat.com>
>
>
> Sorry the late notice, but this is to inform people that I will making 
> the annual newlib snapshot soon (1.16.0).  To the usual suspects: if 
> there is code you have been squirreling away, there's not a lot of 
> time left.  I hope to put the snapshot out next week some time, 
> barring major last minute issues.
>
> -- Jeff J.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.com
> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>