[Fwd: Newlib 1.16.0 snapshot approaching]

[Joel Sherrill]

Till Straumann wrote:
> How about the newlib patch added in 1247 ?
> This should be straightforward.
>
The Altivec patch?  If you can shepherd it in, then
I am OK with it.
> Then there is 1246 which also requires a newlib patch
> but is more complicated.
>
> IMO, at least 1247 should make it (but 1246 would also
> be good. Currently, threads using stdin/stdout/stderr
> leak memory when they are deleted (IIRC)).
>
If you can shepherd both in quickly so we can move
to newlib 1.16 on the 4.9 tools, then I am OK with
improvements and bug fixes.

--joel
> T.
>
> Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> FYI.. time to clean out the closet. :-D
>>
>> --joel
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Newlib 1.16.0 snapshot approaching
>> From:
>> Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat.com>
>> Date:
>> Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:25:09 -0500
>> To:
>> "'newlib at sources.redhat.com'" <newlib at sources.redhat.com>
>>
>> To:
>> "'newlib at sources.redhat.com'" <newlib at sources.redhat.com>
>>
>>
>> Sorry the late notice, but this is to inform people that I will 
>> making the annual newlib snapshot soon (1.16.0).  To the usual 
>> suspects: if there is code you have been squirreling away, there's 
>> not a lot of time left.  I hope to put the snapshot out next week 
>> some time, barring major last minute issues.
>>
>> -- Jeff J.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.com
>> http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>   
>
>