ticker of csp337 works well

[Ray]

GOOD WORKS !
Seems the at91rm9200 support is full functional in terms of samples. When will your codes get into skyeye's release?
Btw, is there anyone test the network support£¿


------------------
Thanks & Best Regards!
Ray
2007-06-18

-------------------------------------------------------------
From: xi yang
Date: 2007-06-17 19:25:46
To:   RTEMS Users; Skyeyee&lt, e h d8 g (i .d,6e h!(
CC:   blackfin.kang at gmail.com
Sub:  ticker of csp337 works well

>>After i implemented the full features of AIC,then ticker works well.
>*** CLOCK TICK TEST ***
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:00   12/31/1988
>TA2  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:00   12/31/1988
>TA3  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:00   12/31/1988
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:05   12/31/1988
>TA2  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:10   12/31/1988
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:10   12/31/1988
>TA3  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:15   12/31/1988
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:15   12/31/1988
>TA2  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:20   12/31/1988
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:20   12/31/1988
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:25   12/31/1988
>TA3  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:30   12/31/1988
>TA2  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:30   12/31/1988
>TA1  - rtems_clock_get - 09:00:30   12/31/1988
>*** END OF CLOCK TICK TEST ***
>
>
>I will subbmit a patch for skyeye later.There is not any problem with
>bsp of 337.
>but just cause skyeye has not implemented the function of real
>hardware completely.
>
>In at91rm.h ,the macros has not been translated to unsigned number,and
>
>for example #define AIC_SVR AT91RM92_AIC_BASE0+128 .I think it is dangerous.
>_______________________________________________
>rtems-users mailing list
>rtems-users at rtems.com
>http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>