An initial proposal for review

Daron Chabot daron.chabot at usask.ca
Wed Mar 26 02:58:23 UTC 2008


Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> Hi Joel, Daron and all,
>           
Comments/corrections to proposal:

Project Details:
-- paragraph 3 - "...providing methods separate methods..."

Deliverables:
-- 1st line of page 3 - "corresponding to each of the implementation." 
"implementation" should be plural.

Project Schedule:
-- 1st and 2nd points - "Baseline Testing" and "baseline testing"
-- only use "baseline testing"
-- 2nd point - "Algorithms" should not be capitalized
-- 4th point - omit the word "currently"
-- 5th point - "implementation of new class" should be "implementation 
of the new class."
-- 7th point - your first sentence is awkward. In the last sentence, 
"how to" should be "how-to".
-- 8th point - punctuation at the end (comma and period)


On a general note, I'm not sure that the object-oriented terminology 
(class, abstract class, methods) is strictly correct in the context of 
RTEMS development. Sure OO ideas are prevalent in RTEMS, but there is no 
innate support for those concepts from the development tools.

Just a thought... :-)

Looks good, though... well done !


-- dc



More information about the users mailing list