patches for newlib-1.16.0 and newlib-1.15.0
ralf.corsepius at rtems.org
Wed Feb 25 13:19:25 UTC 2009
Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Kate Feng wrote:
>> The patches appear confused due to the option flag '-D' that it deserves
>> to be explained further :
>> In newlib-1.16.0/newlib/configuire.host or
>> for the case of '*-*-rtems*)' (e.g. line #529) , one can add the
>> option to the 'newlib_cflags' (e.g. line #532) to improve the
>> performance the
> I think Ralf and I both understood that. We both think
> it is probably OK to do on the head
The latest rtems-4.10 toolchain spin has this change added.
> but are concerned with
> its possible impact on other filesystems. I would love
> to hear the performance impact of this on the FAT filesystem
> as well. But that won't hold this up.
Please test the latest rtems-4.10 toolchain packages and keep an eye
esp. on imfs and dosfs. ATM, the possible side-effects of this change on
them are not fully understood.
Any reports ("no impact", "higher/lower memory demands", "better/worse
throughput", "behavior has improved/worsened") would be welcomed
More information about the users