RTEMS use of Linux specific errno's
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Fri Jun 12 14:39:41 UTC 2009
Peter Dufault wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:42 , Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> I am pretty happy changing EBADRQC to EINVAL but
>> I don't know what ENOTBLOCK should change to.
> I would use ENOTTY, or maybe ENODEV. The name might be ENOTTY but the
> strerror() text is appropriate.
> From http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_03.html#tag_02_03
> [ENOTTY] Inappropriate I/O control operation. A control function has
> been attempted for a file or special file for which the operation is
> [ENODEV] No such device. An attempt was made to apply an inappropriate
> function to a device; for example, trying to read a write-only device
> such as a printer.
from the ioctl man page
EINVAL Request or argp is not valid.
So for simple cases of bad ioctl request number, this is the
right error. I think the others cases fall into the ENODEV sounds
better. Most of the cases would be doing a block operation
on a character device and getting back ENOTTY would confuse
How does that sound?
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the users