joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Tue May 5 12:45:24 UTC 2009
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Looks like we are heading for a new spin of the 4.10 tools
> Yep, .... I am going to address these issues sequentially.
>> + drop - DMISSING_SYSCALL_NAMES from configure.host
> Having cross-checked your proposal, I leaned to agree with your proposal
> and am about to launch a toolchain spin.
> Please test this toolchain! Though this patch is a one-liner, this step
> is quite intrusive, and is not unlikely to have (so far) unconsidered
Yeah! This one worried me. It could easily turn up a LOT of
>> + ALIGN issue not being 8 on SPARC
> Patch? I believe to recall having read an email on this issue, but am
> not sure about this nor can I find it anymore.
I'm not sure about the right solution. I am leaning on changing
the definition of ALIGN in param.h from:
#define ALIGNBYTES (sizeof(int) - 1)
#define ALIGNBYTES (MALLOC_ALIGNMENT - 1)
MALLOC_ALIGNMENT appears to be conditionally defined
in sys/config.h but not for the sparc. :(
I think that's the right solution but would like feedback before
>> + inttypes.h warning
> WIP on my part, but no patch available so far.
OK. Chris and I were on a warning hunt and these showed up
in cpukit. They will disappear again when you get the patch.
More information about the users