Using smc91111.c on powerpc and libchip/network questions
Peter Dufault
dufault at hda.com
Wed Sep 2 17:09:32 UTC 2009
I'm bringing up a Phytec mpc5554 based on the Embedded Brains
mpc55xxevb bsp. It has the SMC LAN91C111 ethernet chip, and after
enabling the driver it compiles. A few questions:
1. The README file in c/src/libchip/network says:
"The reusable chip drivers do not directly access the controller.
They access the registers on the controller via a set of functions
which are provided by the BSP."
This is a definition of "reusable chip drivers" and not what exists in
the c/src/libchip/network directory, correct? Reading this is the
reason I was surprised it compiled immediately - I assumed I needed to
provide these hooks.
Some drivers defer to routines in board support packages but the
smc91111 driver uses locally defined HAL_READ_UINT16() and friends
macros (I just noticed HAL_READ_UINT16() is defined twice) with byte-
swapping appropriate for big-endian architectures only (OK for me), I
noticed similar hard-wired access methods in other drivers. The README
should be changed to make it clear it is how things should be. Is
there a standard set of BSP register access functions I should use
instead?
2. The driver uses "old-style exception processing". I'll replace the
set_vector() call with the appropriate BSP_install_rtems_irq_handler()
call, what other changes? Why do some of the routines have
conditional BSP_SHARED_HANDLER_SUPPORT to install
BSP_install_rtems_shared_irq_handler() instead? If that's the right
thing to do why isn't it done at a lower level?
Thanks -
Peter
More information about the users
mailing list