Any issues to address before 4.10.1?

[Joel Sherrill]

On 07/13/2011 12:19 PM, Till Straumann wrote:
> I hope for 4.10.1 to be released soon, too.
>
> I would recommend PR1775 to be applied and maybe PR1710, too.
>
1710 doesn't have a formal patch and needs some
test code in the tree (at least on the head).

One of the GSOC projects is a file system test suite
and he has a number of minor file system issues.
It sounds like he needs to provide a test for this
case with mounted IMFS, RFS and DOSFS.  That should
shake this out.

I am leaning to a 4.10.2 to catch the issues his
fstest work has identified.  This would be similar
to the 4.6 release which fixed a number of parameter
checking errors.

--joel
> WKR
> -- Till
>
> On 07/13/2011 12:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On 07/13/2011 11:13 AM, Till Straumann wrote:
>>> On 07/12/2011 02:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I want to cut 4.10.1 but want to make sure
>>>> everyone who has had PRs against 4.10.0 is
>>>> happy.
>>>>
>>>> Feedback appreciated.
>>>>
>>> I'm going through my list (but am not quite done yet).
>>>
>>> Please stay posted
>>>
>> I'm not in a huge hurry but it has been Feb since
>> 4.10.0 was released. And there have been some fixes.
>>
>> http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/4.10_Release_Notes#Release_4.10.1_Changes
>>
>>
>> I was hoping to cut it late this week or early next
>> week.
>>
>>> WKR
>>> - T.
>>


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985