Any issues to address before 4.10.1?

[Till Straumann]

What about 1775? This is pretty obvious.

T.


On 07/13/2011 12:43 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 12:19 PM, Till Straumann wrote:
>> I hope for 4.10.1 to be released soon, too.
>>
>> I would recommend PR1775 to be applied and maybe PR1710, too.
>>
> 1710 doesn't have a formal patch and needs some
> test code in the tree (at least on the head).
>
> One of the GSOC projects is a file system test suite
> and he has a number of minor file system issues.
> It sounds like he needs to provide a test for this
> case with mounted IMFS, RFS and DOSFS. That should
> shake this out.
>
> I am leaning to a 4.10.2 to catch the issues his
> fstest work has identified. This would be similar
> to the 4.6 release which fixed a number of parameter
> checking errors.
>
> --joel
>> WKR
>> -- Till
>>
>> On 07/13/2011 12:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> On 07/13/2011 11:13 AM, Till Straumann wrote:
>>>> On 07/12/2011 02:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to cut 4.10.1 but want to make sure
>>>>> everyone who has had PRs against 4.10.0 is
>>>>> happy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feedback appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>> I'm going through my list (but am not quite done yet).
>>>>
>>>> Please stay posted
>>>>
>>> I'm not in a huge hurry but it has been Feb since
>>> 4.10.0 was released. And there have been some fixes.
>>>
>>> http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/4.10_Release_Notes#Release_4.10.1_Changes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I was hoping to cut it late this week or early next
>>> week.
>>>
>>>> WKR
>>>> - T.
>>>
>
>