ANN: microblaze-rtems4.11 toolchain
gedare at rtems.org
Thu Apr 19 16:17:11 UTC 2012
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Ralf Corsepius
<ralf.corsepius at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 05:30 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I disagree with pushing out toolchains for unsupported/uncommitted
>> architectures. It sends the message that we will provide/have support
>> for targets that we do not. I should think that anyone working on a
>> port they ought to be able to manage their own toolchains until they
>> release it publicly.
> Gedare, what is your problem?
> Our users need assistance and help to support us. Leaving these users alone
> and letting them work in their isolated chambers doesn't help anybody.
I did not intend that the tools support should be unavailable, and you
are perfectly justified in helping users develop and maintain tools
for upcoming ports.
My question is more that if the port is not available publicly, there
is no public discussion about the port, and no one publicly knows what
is going on with this port, then why should there be public tools
I don't have a problem with providing tools for unsupported targets--I
just don't quite get the motivation.
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
More information about the users