ANN: microblaze-rtems4.11 toolchain
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Thu Apr 19 16:58:04 UTC 2012
It would be start microblaze support.
I am ok with having the toolchain available as long as their is active community work on adding a port.
It is nice to work from a common toolbase.
Eric Norum <wenorum at lbl.gov> wrote:
>That's what I'm trying to do -- start, or resurrect, microblaze support.
>Having a working toolchain, which Ralf quickly and graciously supplied, is a great first step.
>On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> That's the problem exactly here. The microblaze port if it exists out
>> there is being developed in a cathedral. Now, if someone says they are
>> working on this port and gives access to the code then I would have 0
>> issues with the tools being publicly available since anyone could
>> become an early adopter.
>wenorum at lbl.gov
>rtems-users mailing list
>rtems-users at rtems.org
More information about the users