ANN: microblaze-rtems4.11 toolchain

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at
Thu Apr 19 16:58:04 UTC 2012

It would be start microblaze support.

I am ok with having the toolchain available as long as their is active community work on adding a port. 

It is nice to work from a common toolbase.

Eric Norum <wenorum at> wrote:

>That's what I'm trying to do -- start, or resurrect, microblaze support.
>Having a working toolchain, which Ralf quickly and graciously supplied, is a great first step.
>On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Eric,
>> That's the problem exactly here. The microblaze port if it exists out
>> there is being developed in a cathedral. Now, if someone says they are
>> working on this port and gives access to the code then I would have 0
>> issues with the tools being publicly available since anyone could
>> become an early adopter.
>Eric Norum
>wenorum at
>rtems-users mailing list
>rtems-users at

More information about the users mailing list