ANN: microblaze-rtems4.11 toolchain

[Joel Sherrill]

It would be start microblaze support.

I am ok with having the toolchain available as long as their is active community work on adding a port. 

It is nice to work from a common toolbase.

Eric Norum <wenorum at lbl.gov> wrote:

>That's what I'm trying to do -- start, or resurrect, microblaze support.
>Having a working toolchain, which Ralf quickly and graciously supplied, is a great first step.
>
>On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> Eric,
>> 
>> That's the problem exactly here. The microblaze port if it exists out
>> there is being developed in a cathedral. Now, if someone says they are
>> working on this port and gives access to the code then I would have 0
>> issues with the tools being publicly available since anyone could
>> become an early adopter.
>> 
>
>-- 
>Eric Norum
>wenorum at lbl.gov
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtems-users mailing list
>rtems-users at rtems.org
>http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users