Starting with RTEMS

[Binkowski, Cassio]

When I type in the last line required to build RTEMS:


make install


And most of what shows in the prompt screen is:

make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'

Is it right or not?

P.S: I have bootstrapped it.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 23/02/12 11:55 AM, Binkowski, Cassio wrote:
>
>> Oh, I understand.
>>
>> I actually installed RTEMS 4.9, as the wiki said. But the code was 4.10.2.
>>
>>
> The wiki was out of date and the information wrong. The fact it worked was
> just luck.
>
>  I don't think I understand what you mean by tools in the installer, but
>> I used DOS to build it. A few lines to unzip RTEMS and a few more others
>> to /make/ it.
>>
>
> The tools came in a single executable which is an installer. This is what
> I mean.
>
>
>  I have uninstalled and erased previous version and downloaded the new
>> one, so I can build it again.
>>
>
> Great.
>
>
>  This time, I have downloaded only AVR tools for RTEMS 4.10 installation.
>> But I'm still with the 4.10.2 RTEMS tar. Is that ok?
>>
>>
> Yes this is much much better. The fact 4.10.2 built with the 4.9 tools is
> an accident. I doubt any of the code would have run. The C library would
> have mismatches.
>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120226/0aa2c20f/attachment.html>