Starting with RTEMS

[Binkowski, Cassio]

Please disregards my last e-mail. I was able to figure it out.

However, what I get now when using the following line:

*../rtems-4.10.2/configure --target=avr-rtems4.10 --enable-rtemsbsp=avrtest
--enable-cxx --enable-tests=samples*

is:
[...]
*configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH*
*make[2]: *** [avrtest] Error 1*
*make[2]: Leaving directory
`/c/opt/rtems-4.10/rtems4.10-build/avr-rtems4.10/c'*
*make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1*
*make[1]: Leaving directory
`/c/opt/rtems-4.10/rtems4.10-build/avr-rtems4.10/c'*
*make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1*

Please help.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Binkowski, Cassio <cassioiks at gmail.com>wrote:

> When I type in the last line required to build RTEMS:
>
>
> make install
>
>
> And most of what shows in the prompt screen is:
>
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'
>
> Is it right or not?
>
> P.S: I have bootstrapped it.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>
>> On 23/02/12 11:55 AM, Binkowski, Cassio wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, I understand.
>>>
>>> I actually installed RTEMS 4.9, as the wiki said. But the code was
>>> 4.10.2.
>>>
>>>
>> The wiki was out of date and the information wrong. The fact it worked
>> was just luck.
>>
>>  I don't think I understand what you mean by tools in the installer, but
>>> I used DOS to build it. A few lines to unzip RTEMS and a few more others
>>> to /make/ it.
>>>
>>
>> The tools came in a single executable which is an installer. This is what
>> I mean.
>>
>>
>>  I have uninstalled and erased previous version and downloaded the new
>>> one, so I can build it again.
>>>
>>
>> Great.
>>
>>
>>  This time, I have downloaded only AVR tools for RTEMS 4.10 installation.
>>> But I'm still with the 4.10.2 RTEMS tar. Is that ok?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes this is much much better. The fact 4.10.2 built with the 4.9 tools is
>> an accident. I doubt any of the code would have run. The C library would
>> have mismatches.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120226/10dd1a98/attachment-0001.html>