Space Qualified RTEMS
pjs1 at mssl.ucl.ac.uk
Thu Jan 26 15:46:46 UTC 2012
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:01:30PM +0100, Rolf Schroedter wrote:
> Until today, nobody from ESA complained about that I'm using the
> RTEMS-4.10 branch, provided by Aeroflex-Gaisler
> http://www.gaisler.com. This is a bit behind the actual versions
> from rtems.org. I'm using it with 2-3 (non-critical) bug-fixes and
Hi Lee and all,
We are using the latest Aeroflex-Gaisler RTEMS too on the Solar Orbiter EUI
instrument and will keep open the option of an upgrade/patch or two during
development if necessary. It will be interesting to see what the other
We like 4.10 or later for the same reasons expressed by others: bugfixes,
features and support together with better testing. RFS too.
Rolf, what bug-fixes did you find necessary? Are they just selected official
patches from 4.10 to latest?
Philip J. Smith __o Dept. of Space and Climate Physics,
pjs1 at mssl.ucl.ac.uk _'\<; Mullard Space Science Laboratory,
((( (*)/(*) University College London.
More information about the users