Space Qualified RTEMS
jiri at gaisler.com
Thu Jan 26 16:43:09 UTC 2012
Phil Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:01:30PM +0100, Rolf Schroedter wrote:
>> Until today, nobody from ESA complained about that I'm using the
>> RTEMS-4.10 branch, provided by Aeroflex-Gaisler
>> http://www.gaisler.com. This is a bit behind the actual versions
>> from rtems.org. I'm using it with 2-3 (non-critical) bug-fixes and
> Hi Lee and all,
> We are using the latest Aeroflex-Gaisler RTEMS too on the Solar Orbiter EUI
> instrument and will keep open the option of an upgrade/patch or two during
> development if necessary. It will be interesting to see what the other
> instruments choose.
Note that our intention is to push our RTEMS-4.10 patch-set
into the main RTEMS tree, so that the difference between the
Aeroflex-Gaisler and RTEMS.org trees is minimal (or none).
We will still maintain our integrated tool-chain (RCC) but
the RTEMS kernel should track RTEMS.org. The syncing should
start within a few weeks, work-load permitting, and show up
in 4.11 I guess ...
> We like 4.10 or later for the same reasons expressed by others: bugfixes,
> features and support together with better testing. RFS too.
> Rolf, what bug-fixes did you find necessary? Are they just selected official
> patches from 4.10 to latest?
More information about the users