Rtems-4.10.2 and RPC on PowerPC
Kate Feng
feng at bnl.gov
Fri Oct 19 21:13:35 UTC 2012
Is there anything wrong with the patch I sent yesterday for 4.10.0 ?
Does it work for you in 4.10.0?
We have used that code for more than a year.
I debugged RTEM4.10.2 today. It seems that the main issue is not
related to the patch I sent
or the code in RTEM4.10.2 (e.g. bootcard.c), although there are some
discrepancies
between the two. It seems that there are some bugs in the compiling tools
for RTEMS-4.10.2 because malloc() does not behave the same as
RTEMS-4.10.0 does,
even though the relevant code are the same.
For both 4.10.0 and 4.10.2, I used the gcc-core-4.4.6.tar.bz2 and
gcc-g++-4.4.6.tar.bz2.
However, for RTEMS4.10.0, I applied the patch
gcc-core-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110420.diff
For RTEMS4.10.2, I applied the patch
gcc-core-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110829.diff, and
gcc-g++-4.4.6-rtems4.10-20110829.diff.
Thus, it might depends on which version of compiling tools you use for
both RTEMS-4.10
and RTEMS-4.10.2. Perhaps, the tools are not interchangeable between
4.10.0 and 4.10.2,
which I did not test yet. Others might know these gcc tool patches
better than me.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Kate Feng
On 10/18/2012 07:24 PM, rwas wrote:
>
>
> Kate Feng wrote:
>>
>> Yes, RTEMS4.10.1 and RTEMS4.10.2 still have bugs.
>
>
> Will these patches fix 4.10.2?
>
> If 4.10.2 is this buggy I may go back to 4.9. :(
>
> Thanks Kate.
>
> Robert W.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
More information about the users
mailing list