Unaligned problem when porting rtems for arm

[Peng Fan]

Version: arm-rtems4.10-gcc ---- gcc version 4.4.7 20120313

is okay.


2013/4/24 Peng Fan <van.freenix at gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
>
> 2013/4/24 Joel Sherrill <Joel.Sherrill at oarcorp.com>
>
>> The arm gdb bsp is intended to help find the correct options. They could
>> be wrong. When I did the bsp variants, I picked CPU variants that looked to
>> hit various multilibs.
>>
>> The arm had a lot of CPU models and it is easy to make a mistake. Is this
>> with the bsp for the simulator in gdb?
>>
> I am porting RTEMS to a hardware board based on S3C6410, not for the
> simulator for gdb.
>
>>
>> --joel
>>
>> Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Given the newness of this port, I would guess the options are wrong.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Sebastian Huber
>> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > in case GCC uses a half-word load or store where it shouldn't, then you
>> have
>> >
>> > 1. wrong compiler options, or
>> > 2. a compiler bug.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>> >
>> > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
>> > Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
>> > Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
>> > E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>> > PGP     : Public key available on request.
>> >
>> > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rtems-users mailing list
>> > rtems-users at rtems.org
>> > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-users mailing list
>> rtems-users at rtems.org
>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130424/a6c2f67a/attachment-0001.html>