Paranoia flaw on pc386

[Gedare Bloom]

I think the FLAWs can be safely ignored, but may be will matter if
your application uses floating point operations.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Ardalan Pouyabahar
<a.pouyabahar at ece.ut.ac.ir> wrote:
> Hello,
> Paranoia output on rtems pc386 had 1 flaw which was this:
>
> Sticky bit used incorrectly or not at all.
> TEST: lack(s) of guard digits or failure(s) to correctly round or chop
> (noted above) count as one flaw in the final tally below
> ERROR: Severity: FLAW:  lack(s) of guard digits or failure(s) to correctly
> round or chop
> (noted above) count as one flaw in the final tally below.
> PASS: lack(s) of guard digits or failure(s) to correctly round or chop
> (noted above) count as one flaw in the final tally below
>
> I've searched in rtems mailing list and google but couldn't find anything
> useful yet. Does anyone know what it means and how can I solve it?
> I compiled whole rtems and paranoia without optimization.
> Thanks,
> A.Pouyabahar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-users mailing list
> rtems-users at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users
>