[HansHuang]Which is Nano-X version as scr_mx1sl.c?

[Pavel Pisa]

Hello Hans,

the MicroWindows/Nano-X structures little differs between
versions. It is some time I have pointed you to examples
so I do not exactly remember which version of our code
I have pointed to. We use older MW version in sysless
project because that version allows simpler adaptation
for indirect framebuffer updates and 16 bit word based
bitmaps/fonts acceleration for sub 8 BPP framebuffer
formats.

We use newer versions with RTEMS which has better
common bit-blit optimization for standard formats.

But example should be straightforward.
Sysless includes all required MW/NX source files directly.

As for RTEMS graphic toolkit, it is based on actual sources.

I am attaching patches for our HW which should apply to actual
MW/NX GIT. But they are mainly meant as examples for you.

I can prepare tarball of more MW versions which we use there
but I do not expect that it has so big value. They are GIT
or CVS snapshosts.

Best wishes,

                 Pavel

On Thursday 17 of July 2014 09:42:04 黄喜 wrote:
> Dear Pavel :
>
>
> Nice to send mail to you again.
>
>
> I browse the Microwindows code and found the order of member variables in
> scrdev structure of scr_rtems.c is different from scr_mx1sl.c file. I
> download the latest Microwindows code, May be your Microwindows code is
> another old one.Right?
>
>
> Thanks!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mwin-driver-mx1sl.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 19957 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140722/bc982266/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mwin-add-mx1sl-to-make.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1062 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140722/bc982266/attachment-0005.bin>