Looking for a C++11 support Overview
Isaac Gutekunst
isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com
Thu Feb 25 21:52:28 UTC 2016
Thanks! That's useful to know.
I'll email back if we look into completing for std::chrono. The other
four where the most important.
Does ARMV7m not need libatomic?
Isaac
On 02/25/2016 03:37 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> For proper C++11 support you need RTEMS 4.12. Below "fully supported"
> means as far as GCC/libstdc++ supports it.
>
> On 24/02/16 18:52, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> Which C++11 features are supported by RTEMS?
>> Is there a table listing supported features, and limitations? Sorry if
>> I just missed it.
>>
>> I'm specially interested in
>>
>> * std::atomic
>
> Fully supported on targets that don't need libatomic.
>
>> * std::thread
>> * std::queue
>> * std::mutex
>> * std::condition_variable
>
> Fully supported.
>
>> * std::chrono
>
> Partially supported. For the details run the libstdc++ test suite and
> check the libstdc++ configure script which doesn't detect all RTEMS
> features (we have to fix several configure checks for this).
>
>>
>>
>> Depending on what level of support is available, we might build our
>> own primitives so we can develop platform independent code, for on and
>> off target testing.
>>
>> If we can simply rely on the C++ library, that might be preferable,
>> but requires some consideration.
>
> From an RTEMS project point of view it would be nice if you don't add
> your own code to fix missing features in RTEMS and instead add the
> missing parts to RTEMS.
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Isaac
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the users
mailing list