Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Thu Feb 25 22:57:44 UTC 2016

On 26/02/2016 07:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I posted patches to add the aarch64-rtems target.
> binutils: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-02/msg00404.html
> gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01754.html
> FWIW I also cleaned up the x86_64-rtems target addition patches and
> those were submitted also.
> BINUTILS: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-02/msg00403.html
> GCC: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01752.html


> Chris.. Assuming these are in the upstream repositories in the next
> couple of days, how should we address getting these targets in the RSB?
> Tarball
> plus patch or just reference git until the next release?

Any of those are fine. I do not mind what you decide. They are just 
config lines in the RSB.

A gcc snaphots would be less demanding on the upstream git servers. I am 
not sure binutils does snapshots. Newlib has snapshots.


More information about the users mailing list