RSB tool binary locations

[Joel Sherrill]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 19/01/2016 10:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> I have spent the day trying to build tools since Sebastian's
>> announcement of an RSB bump.
>>
>> I have had multiple problems that were not RTEMS specific. I had a
>> partial download of
>> the gcc snapshot. The incomplete file failed the untar. The partial
>> download wasn't noticed.
>> I am guessing that not having a hash on the file caused this.
>>
>
> Please add the hash or hassle Sebastian.
>
>

Here they are. My builds are not going to finish for hours but this is what
the
sparc build has reported missing so far.

82ac8abf9d133efd3a246ca7eec7b39f  sources/gcc-6-20160117.tar.bz2
4fa79de240d1d3556ca0e3e83d197636  sources/newlib-2.3.0.20160104.tar.gz
89e59fe665e2b3ad44a6789f40b059a0  sources/mpfr-2.4.2.tar.bz2
5b34aa804d514cc295414a963aedb6bf  sources/mpc-0.8.1.tar.gz
dd60683d7057917e34630b4a787932e8  sources/gmp-4.3.2.tar.bz2




Releases will fail if there is no hash.




>
>
>
>> mpfr failed to download on another run.
>>
>>
> It can happen.
>
> Release use our hosts and this thread is about RC1.
>
> Not sure if our network issues are local but there was bad stuff going
>> on today.
>>
>
> Lets see what the error is.
>
>
Abnormally cold here and a national holiday. Local equipment failures plus
too many
people at home streaming is a


> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160118/019c35f6/attachment-0002.html>