Problem building master
Isaac Gutekunst
isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com
Mon Mar 7 17:57:18 UTC 2016
Okay, main problem was combination in a bad rebase, followed by a lack
of bootrap -p.
I have a new problem, but for organization I'll start a new thread.
On 03/07/2016 12:35 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Isaac Gutekunst
> <isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com <mailto:isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com>> wrote:
>
> I think I've found some git trouble going on, so I'll give that a
> shot. I think I might have a strange hybrid of the 4.11 and 4.12
> branch due to a nasty rebase.
>
>
> Sometimes I ended up in strange situations with git also. 99% of the
> time all is well
> but I still screw things up occasionally.
>
> I hope it helps.
>
> --joel
>
> Isaac
>
>
> On 03/07/2016 11:54 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
>
> ../rtems/configure --enable-rtemsbsp="stm32f7x"
> --enable-maintainer-mode
> --disable-tests --enable-cxx --target=arm-rtems4.12
> --prefix=$RTEMS/lib-rtems --disable-networking
>
> Since this is still our unreleased BSP, there could be some issues
> related to it. I'm just not sure what to look for.
>
>
> I built GCC last week I believe.
>
> Here is the --version output:
>
> arm-rtems4.12-gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20160228 (RTEMS 4.12, RSB
> b537e5536459e207fc8e56a1df3774c1700606d5, Newlib 2.3.0.20160226)
>
>
> Isaac
>
> On 03/07/2016 11:32 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> This is odd. I just did a fresh update and rebuilt sparc/sis
> with POSIX
> enabled.
> I didn't have trouble.
>
> The gcc+newlib version bumped last week but that shouldn't
> have had an
> impact
> yet and wouldn't have broken this. It added prototypes for a
> few pthread
> routines
> I am adding.
>
> How did you configure exactly?
>
> --joel
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Isaac Gutekunst
> <isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com
> <mailto:isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com>
> <mailto:isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com
> <mailto:isaac.gutekunst at vecna.com>>> wrote:
>
> Correcting my subject typo.
>
> On 03/07/2016 10:23 AM, Isaac Gutekunst wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build RTEMS master for ARM, and am
> getting the
> following
> compile error:
>
>
> ../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c:
> In
> function 'pipe_interruptible':
>
> ../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c:76:34:
> error: 'Thread_queue_Control {aka struct
> <anonymous>}' has no
> member
> named 'state'
> the_barrier->Barrier.Wait_queue.state |=
> STATES_INTERRUPTIBLE_BY_SIGNAL;
> ^
>
> ../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/libfs/src/pipe/fifo.c:80:34:
> error: 'Thread_queue_Control {aka struct
> <anonymous>}' has no
> member
> named 'state'
> the_barrier->Barrier.Wait_queue.state |=
> STATES_INTERRUPTIBLE_BY_SIGNAL;
>
>
> I can't seem to find a definition for the
> Barrier_Control struct,
> andhaven't been able to find a root cause.
>
> It could as always be a bootstrapping/cleaning
> problem where the
> wrong
> file is being built, but I don't think so.
>
> Anyone know what's going on?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Isaac
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org>
> <mailto:users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org>>
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org>
> <mailto:users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org>>
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org>
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at rtems.org <mailto:users at rtems.org>
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
More information about the users
mailing list