What's the fate of rtems 4.12?

[Karim, Hassan]

Thanks for all of the dedicated work.
Especially on the documentation.
I get some things now that I didn't the first 8 times I built RTEMS.
### NOTE ### Follow the recommendations for sandboxing early!



Regards,

*Hassan Karim, CISSP*
https://www.linkedin.com/in/hassankarimcissp
Comp Sci Ph.D. Student
Howard University
(202) 569-1012

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 17/4/17 4:52 am, Hassan Karim wrote:
> > For a while, I've seen a lot development on the 4.11 branch.
>
> A lot of the work has been bug fixes that happen on a release and given
> the period of time it took to get 4.11 released this is expected. Also
> included is work related to the release process as I improve and better
> automate what needs to happen, for example the release notes, doxygen
> reports, and documentation.
>
> > Is 4.12 being deprecated?
>
> No. Please refer to the Releases page in the wiki ..
> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Release.
>
> > When I went to rebuild based on 4.12, I am no longer getting all of the
> > b-sets that I was expecting. Specifically, 4.12/rtems-sparc
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong or have things been moved out of 4.12?
> >
>
> No, this looks like a bug. Please click on 'Create Bug' link in the 4.12
> row of the Supported Releases table.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170416/6c452e6d/attachment-0002.html>