RTEMS in AMP mode

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Fri Oct 19 00:17:32 UTC 2018

On 18/10/2018 15:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 17/10/2018 18:03, Alan Cudmore wrote:
>> Is the POSIX API preferred for RTEMS applications moving forward?
> I would use standard APIs such as POSIX, C++11 or boost.

Does this mean https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2514 is finished and can be closed?


More information about the users mailing list