Someone using CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_DEVICE_DRIVER_TABLE?

[Sebastian Huber]

On 09/04/2019 14:46, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 2:10 AM Sebastian Huber 
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de 
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello,
> 
>     is the CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_DEVICE_DRIVER_TABLE actually used in
>     application configurations?
> 
> 
> I seriously hope not. It was absolutely needed before the addition of 
> the various configuration parameters to add bsp and application specific 
> driver entries at the beginning and end of the table.
> 
> I added those to stop someone (Eric Norum?) from needing to define their 
> own table.
> 
> FWIW I would be happy to see all the define your own table options 
> disappear as long as we have covered the case for someone to add a 
> custom entry to arrays like this and the filesystem table.

https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3844

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.