change log for rtems-testing (2010-08-26)
rtems-vc at rtems.org
rtems-vc at rtems.org
Fri Aug 27 04:42:36 UTC 2010
*joel*:
2010-08-26 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>
* Explanations.txt: Remove cases which are now RTEMS_DEBUG.
M 1.291 rtems-coverage/ChangeLog
M 1.71 rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt
diff -u rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog:1.290 rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog:1.291
--- rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog:1.290 Mon Aug 9 08:20:28 2010
+++ rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog Thu Aug 26 15:03:49 2010
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2010-08-26 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>
+
+ * Explanations.txt: Remove cases which are now RTEMS_DEBUG.
+
2010-08-09 Bharath Suri <bharath.s.jois at gmail.com>
PR 1659/testing
diff -u rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt:1.70 rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt:1.71
--- rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt:1.70 Mon Aug 9 08:20:28 2010
+++ rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt Thu Aug 26 15:03:50 2010
@@ -158,35 +158,3 @@
Email Sebastian
Sebastian needs to write a test case for this.
+++
-
-eval.c:95
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_path, if that is OK.
-+++
-
-eval.c:98
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_path, if that is OK.
-+++
-
-eval.c:40
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_relative_path, if that is OK.
-+++
-
-eval.c:43
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_relative_path, if that is OK.
-+++
--
Generated by Deluxe Loginfo [http://www.codewiz.org/projects/index.html#loginfo] 2.122 by Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/vc/attachments/20100826/56b28e69/attachment.html>
More information about the vc
mailing list