change log for rtems-testing (2010-08-26)

[rtems-vc at rtems.org]

 *joel*:
2010-08-26	Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>

	* Explanations.txt: Remove cases which are now RTEMS_DEBUG.

M  1.291  rtems-coverage/ChangeLog
M   1.71  rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt

diff -u rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog:1.290 rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog:1.291
--- rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog:1.290	Mon Aug  9 08:20:28 2010
+++ rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/ChangeLog	Thu Aug 26 15:03:49 2010
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2010-08-26	Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>
+
+	* Explanations.txt: Remove cases which are now RTEMS_DEBUG.
+
 2010-08-09	Bharath Suri <bharath.s.jois at gmail.com>
 
 	PR 1659/testing

diff -u rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt:1.70 rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt:1.71
--- rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt:1.70	Mon Aug  9 08:20:28 2010
+++ rtems-testing/rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt	Thu Aug 26 15:03:50 2010
@@ -158,35 +158,3 @@
 Email Sebastian
 Sebastian needs to write a test case for this.
 +++
-
-eval.c:95
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_path, if that is OK.
-+++
-
-eval.c:98
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_path, if that is OK.
-+++
-
-eval.c:40
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_relative_path, if that is OK.
-+++
-
-eval.c:43
-Discuss
-This, I feel is a valid test unless we have certain guidelines / tests
-to be done in the callers.
-Or we could have a new test that directly calls the
-rtems_filesystem_evaluate_relative_path, if that is OK.
-+++



--

Generated by Deluxe Loginfo [http://www.codewiz.org/projects/index.html#loginfo] 2.122 by Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/vc/attachments/20100826/56b28e69/attachment.html>