change log for rtems (2011-02-17)

[Joel Sherrill]

On 02/21/2011 06:19 AM, Peter Dufault wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:49 , Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>>> +  Scheduler_Control  _Scheduler = {
>>> +    .Ready_queues.priority = NULL,
>>> +    .Operations            = SCHEDULER_ENTRY_POINTS
>>>    };
> Yes, please, no more of those in header files!
>
I'm sorry.  I had seen those in device drivers and thought it
was safe.  This was the first one I added so hopefully there
aren't many.
> Is there a general RTEMS rule that this isn't allowed in a header file if it is visible in C++?  I'll open some bug reports.
>
If you see it elsewhere, please report it.
> Peter
> -----------------
> Peter Dufault
> HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-vc mailing list
> rtems-vc at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-vc


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985